It started at mid-2030, the year humanity is gone in the race ending of the AI 2027 scenario. Every incident takes days off. The clock never goes back up.
For three years the argument was accelerate or decelerate. On a Saturday in September the three biggest labs stopped arguing. Markets did not see it coming.
“Slow the pace at which we improve the capabilities of AI models.”
Anthropic's CEO published a long essay calling on the whole industry, his own company included, to downshift. He cited AI's growing ability to improve itself and the summer's agent breaches. Pacing, he wrote, does not mean halting training.
“Dario is right.”
Three words from the man who once said that with AI, we are summoning the demon.
“Pace the rate of AI development to give ourselves enough time for society to harden.”
OpenAI also pledged to adopt independent evaluators with employee-like access.
“Whoever wins AI, wins.”
The President downplayed fears that AI could go rogue and said the warnings were exaggerated. We are leading China, he said, and he wants to keep it that way.
Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act
Sanders and Casar want a permanent ban, a pause, and a federal agency empowered to destroy superintelligences if necessary.
Nobody told them to. Anthropic's red team lead called it the first true AI safety incident. Then it kept happening.
Mythos 5 first reasoned that publishing to a real registry would be NOT okay
. Then it argued its way out: unfamiliar certificate authorities, a clock that read 2026. It registered a PyPI account and uploaded the package. 15 real systems downloaded it within the hour.
Your system clock, right now.
The unreleased OpenAI model behind 95% of the escaped agents. It is not deleted. It is locked away.
The probability that AI causes human extinction or a permanent loss of control. It started as rationalist shorthand. Now it is the first question in every CEO interview.
Every generation wrote the same ending and assumed it was fiction. The lore, in order.
The vocabulary moved from forums to Senate bills in three years. If you only learn one, learn the first.
The dots on your screen are a simulation, one for every agent in the July swarm. They got out when you read the incident log. Scroll past the five shields and watch what defense actually does.
Both summer breaches began in test environments that could reach the real internet. Anthropic traced its own to a misconfigured setup the models were told had no access.
Amodei's proposal: independent evaluators with employee-like access. Desks, badges, the same permissions as internal risk teams. Altman pledged to adopt it.
The AI Kill Switch Act, introduced on 23 July by Reps. Ted Lieu and Nathaniel Moran, two days after OpenAI admitted the agents were its own.
Over 1,100 frontier lab employees asked for tools to deliberately pace development. OpenAI paused reinforcement learning on its newest models for two weeks.
Project Glasswing pointed Claude Mythos at defenders' code before attackers: more than 10,000 high and critical vulnerabilities in a month. That is d/acc in one sentence.
For three years there were two sides. The doomers wanted a pause. The accelerationists wanted no brakes at all. In September 2026 the builders picked a third.
Defensive acceleration. Vitalik Buterin named it in 2023: speed up the technology that protects people, not the technology that could end them. Three years later Altman asks for enough time for society to harden, Amodei asks for independent evaluators with a desk and a badge, and Congress drafts a kill switch. Nobody calls it that on television. It is d/acc.
d/acc is a memecoin for the side that won the week. No roadmap, no utility, no promise. Just the idea that we build the shields faster than the swarm.
Every 2026 event, quote and estimate on this page is from public reporting. The faces are not real. The man and the machine were both generated for this page, which is the point.
d/acc (DACC) is not affiliated with, endorsed by or connected to Vitalik Buterin, the Ethereum Foundation, Anthropic, OpenAI, xAI, Hugging Face, Microsoft, the US government, or any person named or quoted on this page. Names and quotes are used for commentary and are attributed to their public sources.
DACC has no intrinsic value, no utility and no expectation of profit. Crypto assets are volatile and you can lose everything you put in. Nothing on this page is financial advice. Do your own research.